Quoting%20commentary for Zevachim 67:16

יכול לא יביא ואם הביא כשר הא למה זה דומה לתלמיד שאמר לו רבו הבא לי חטים והביא לו חטים ושעורים שאינו כמעביר על דבריו אלא מוסיף על דבריו וכשר

but not an unclean animal; and a negative injunction which is inferred from an affirmative precept ranks as an affirmative precept?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And but for the special negative injunction which follows in the Scriptural text it would involve no flagellation.');">¹⁸</span> - Said R'Jacob to R'Jeremiah B'Tahlifa: I will explain it to you: There is no disagreement at all about the limbs of an unclean [domesticated] animal; they disagree about a beast [of chase],<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Animals are technically divided into behemah (domesticated animal) and hayyah (wild beast, lit., 'living thing') . The former includes dogs, horses and camels; the latter includes the hart, deer and roebuck.');">¹⁹</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Zevachim 67:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.